AAM-003

AI Red
Team

Can your AI withstand realistic attacks?

AI systems create new possibilities – and new attack surfaces. Prompt injection, manipulated data sources, insecure agents, or abused tools can bypass safeguards and deliberately influence system behaviour.

The AI Red Team simulates realistic attacks against models, agents, data, interfaces, and infrastructure. Not to compile a list of theoretical risks, but to show what is actually possible under realistic conditions.

Discuss the AI Red Team →
01

Why

Traditional penetration testing remains important. AI systems, however, add new layers to the attack surface: models can be manipulated, prompts abused, RAG content influenced, and agents induced to use tools or permissions in ways that were never intended.

These attacks do not target infrastructure or software alone. They can alter information, expose sensitive data, influence decisions, or cause an AI system to be used for unintended purposes. Assumptions about safeguards therefore need to be tested under realistic conditions.

Trust must withstand attack.
02

What

Five attack surfaces. One realistic picture.

01

AI Security

Prompt injection, jailbreaks, model abuse, APIs, authentication, authorisation, and secrets

02

Agents & Tools

Agent behaviour, tool security, MCP, permissions, agent chains, and privilege escalation

03

Data & Knowledge

RAG manipulation, data poisoning, data integrity, knowledge sources, and embeddings

04

Infrastructure

Cloud, network segmentation, containers, identity & access management, and supply chain

05

Resilience

Detection, logging, monitoring, incident response, and recoverability

03

How

Together, we define the scope and rules of engagement, analyse the architecture and threat model, and derive realistic attack paths. Our specialists then challenge AI components and their environment to determine how they withstand real attacks.

1

Scope

Define objectives, boundaries, test environment, and attack scenarios

2

Model

Understand the architecture and develop realistic attack paths

3

Attack

Attack models, agents, data sources, APIs, and infrastructure

4

Validate

Assess impact, safeguards, and actual exploitability

5

Improve

Prioritise findings and derive concrete improvements

04

Knowledge

After the AI Red Team, you have a much clearer understanding of how resilient your AI actually is:

Which realistic attack scenarios against your AI actually work

Which attack paths connect models, agents, data, APIs, or infrastructure

Which weaknesses have the greatest impact on security and trustworthiness

Which existing protection, detection, and response measures are effective – and which are not

Which technical improvements should be implemented first

Typical deliverablesAI Red Team ReportAttack ScenariosAttack PathsTechnical FindingsPrioritised ImprovementsExecutive Summary
05

scip AG

AI Red Teaming requires an attacker mindset – and an understanding of AI.

For more than twenty years, scip has developed and conducted demanding Red Team exercises for organisations with high security requirements. We combine this offensive experience with our own research into Trustworthy AI and modern attack techniques targeting foundation models, agents, and AI ecosystems.

Our goal is not to produce as many findings as possible. We want to show which assumptions hold under realistic attack conditions, where safeguards fail, and what actually matters for the resilience of your AI.

20+
Realistic
AI + Security
06

Perspective

07

Insights

08

Assumptions are easy.
Evidence is harder.

You do not need to assume that your safeguards work. Let us find out what happens when someone tries to bypass them.

Discuss with scip →